One of the groups that I contribute to is HALT (Help Abolish Legal Tyranny). This group was founded in 1978, and is dedicated to fighting for consumer rights in the legal field. Given the significant amounts of money and power that are lined up to protect lawyers and judges, this group has done relatively well fighting for the little guy. They help push for public access to discipline hearings and results against lawyers and judges, as well as fighting against the always present “unauthorized practice of law”.
The “unauthorized practice of law” rules are unfortunately designed more to protect a legal monopoly than to serve the public interest. One of the latest examples is from March, when the Wisconsin State Bar submitted a proposal to further restrict the definition, and force consumers to hire lawyers for mundane things that otherwise could be done by a real estate agent, an income tax preparer, or a legal document assistant. The Bar claimed (as usual) it was to protect the public from scam artists that claim to be attorneys. However, after two years of beating the bushes, they could produce only six complaints by consumers about non-lawyers.
This stands in contrast to the over 2000 complaints Wisconsin consumers filed against Wisconsin lawyers. That statistic just about says it all.
After testimony from HALT and from Wisconsin businesses and others, the State Bar asked the Court to put a hold on any decision. I wouldn’t be surprised if the proposal surfaces again when the Bar thinks things have cooled down.
One new website that HALT profiled in their recent newsletter is Avvo. This is a website that is bringing consumer reviews of lawyers to the public, as well as providing answers to legal questions. The answers are by attorneys. I think this website is an idea that is long overdue. Given the secretive nature of lawyer discipline and the lack of public information, this may be the future route to put more power in the consumer’s hands and truly protect the public.
AvvoHALT