Campaign is heating up in California. Only four more days left, and then thankfully we won't be subjected to any more Indian casino ads. No matter what you watch on TV or listen to on the radio, you hear pro and con casino ads. Unbelievable the amount of money being spent.
There's also a term limits bill being pushed by politicians and those who benefit from the system. They neglect to mention that there's a loophole conveniently letting current incumbents serve longer during the transition. Like many other states, we have some real winners, corrupt to the bone. The clean elections idea sounds good, and perhaps it will spread AND be effective.
I assume the presidential races become clearer in the next month or so. Seems like McCain may end up the Republican nominee, as Romney seems to polished and pretty boy, and Paul and Huckabee fall to the rear. However, you never know. McCain is someone who got a lot of good press in the past for being a maverick and standing up to special interests. However, he has flopped on several of his positions to appease the Republican right wingers in the primary, and I get the feeling he's become just another politician who has sacrificed his beliefs. There was an interesting article on salon.com about him. Link is below:
JohnMcCainUnless Bush's war takes a dramatic turn for the better, or the Dems self destruct, I think they take the White House this year. Not necessarily a great prize, given they'll inherit huge deficits, several wars, and an economy in recession. Maybe they'll make the hard choices to improve things, but given the poor performance of the Dems in Congress this past year, I don't have my hopes up too high.
I used to think Obama would get nomination over Clinton, but I'm not sure. Still pretty close to call, and she is in the lead. She has some negatives, and I would think Obama would do better than her in a general election. We'll see.
One thing that I've noticed is that in the mainstream media there is not a whole lot of coverage of issues and in depth analysis of the candidates records and proposals. It seems that 70 or 80% of the coverage is devoted to calling a horse race. We get daily updates of how each candidate did, what they said (a little) and analysis of who's doing better or worse, and information about the controversy of the day. I don't know if this is a function of the editors and owners of the papers preventing in depth stories, or if it is a lack of time or lack of knowledge on the reporters' part. It is one of the reasons why the electorate is not always that well informed. (One of the other is that too many people are focused on Britney's latest hospital stay).