Hold on to your hats, this is gonna be a long blog entry. I started with a few things, but then kept finding more and more stuff to add.
I checked out www.salon.com, which I’ve been meaning to do for awhile. It used to be a magazine way back and now is online. Was reading some articles on the middle east, and ran into one link to an article that was pretty interesting. It makes the argument that we should basically leave the middle east alone, and that some of the radicalism would die down as a result. It was interesting, so I’m posting the link below:
MiddleEastI think some of its mentions of previous miscalculations ties in nicely to the miscalculations and ignorance that were apparently widespread in the Bush administration. I also remember reading an article recently that pointed out that despite the rhetoric coming out of Iran, there is actually widespread appreciation for the US in a significant portion of the population, and that appreciation is directly a result of the US not meddling in Iran for the last 20 or more years. The author was putting the idea forth that the best way to better relations in some cases is not to meddle so much.
There was also another article about “launching brand Petraeus”, that was reprinted on salon.com from its original posting on toms dispatch. The link is below:
TomsDispatchOnce you get to the page, scroll down to get to the “launching brand Petraeus” article.
I thought the article was fascinating. It points out the high US casualty rate from IED’s (improvised explosive devices), and also points out the cost of those is less than the cost of a pizza, plus a minor $40 labor cost for someone to plant it. What you end up with is an estimated 850 Al Quaeda members and an unknown larger amount of Sunni and Shiite extremists and gangsters, all together costing the US an estimated $3 billion dollars a day, as well as the personnel losses. In addition, if you do the math, you have the US spending perhaps 100 times as much money a day as the insurgents, and committing a force of 100 times as many people as the insurgents. Yet the US is not making progress. There is no way we’re gonna win in the near term, and it will bankrupt the country in the long run.
The article also mentions the payoffs to insurgents and the corruption in the US related contractor firms. Over 75 investigations currently active. I have another link to a whistleblower blog here on blogstream that had an interesting post on page 5 on Iraq (may be another good one on page 4 as well). Once you get to page 5, scroll down to Iraq whistleblowers.
IraqWhistleblowersSince the current Iraq situation is over 3700 US deaths, most likely over 10K injured and mentally damaged, tens of thousands Iraqi deaths, hundreds of billions of dollars spent, and absolutely no end in sight, a relatively quick withdrawal would make sense. Unfortunately the Dems have no backbone, and Bushies want to extend it through Bush’s term in office so that more of the blame for “losing” Iraq goes to the next president (most likely a Democrat).
Mother Jones had some good articles over the last few years, detailing among other things, the special Pentagon intelligence group that was set up to twist intelligence as needed. I also have read elsewhere about the practice some officers have of heading into Iraq for a few days a month just to raise their pay to combat level, and the areas that are out of Iraq and far removed from combat that still get combat pay. Add this to the lack of proper armor and protection for the troops over the last few years, the eagerness of Bushies to praise the troops while cutting Veterans benefits and the VA budget, and you have a case of the privileged enjoying their life while those further down the food chain take the brunt of the pain.
Nina Berman is a photographer who has a nice portfolio on her website, including some photos of troops under the “Purple Heart” section. The link is below:
NinaBermanPhotosThe San Francisco Chronicle also had a piece on vets. The majority of the vets come from smaller towns, often joining due to patriotism, or due to a lack of other options. At the end of the day, you have thousands of families in hundreds of towns that either have to deal with deaths and/or disfiguring or mental trauma. In most cases, the families are not rolling in money, so you have financial struggles as well. In the meantime, many of the politicians who voted for this mess continue to draw their six figure goverment salaries, go home to meet their complete, healthy families, and bear very little brunt of the costs of war. The only politician I had a little respect for was one that writes the family of every soldier killed in Iraq. He does this once a week, on a Saturday or Sunday. I believe it was one from Virginia or one of the states around there. I don’t know if he has continued to do that, as I read about it probably in 2006.
The Republicans that evaded military combat service (Bush, Cheney, Wolfie, etc) yet send others to die, and the Dems who first vote for war then later try to deny and sidestep it, and don’t push stronger for a withdrawal for fear that would hurt the Dems politically if they are blamed for future problems (Clinton, Pelosi, Edwards, etc), all are an embarassment to the US. Maybe we’ll get lucky with more principled, honest politicians in the future, but I doubt it. In the meantime, more soldiers and civilians die.
I found a few organizations that support veterans and active personnel. Links are below:
WoundedWarriorProjectBlueStarMomsAnd last but not least, I was checking out salon.com again today and there's an article about massive arms sales to Iraq, with not a lot of control and an awful lot of risk. Seems like we just do one stupid thing after another. Link is below:
IraqArmsSales