I was in Vegas this past week, visiting the Land of the Surreal. Every time I go there it just feels like a strange land. You have the downtown and strip casinos that are outlandish and huge, and at times make the city look more like a fake movie set or “to scale” model. Then when you drive around the greater Vegas area, you see a ton of housing developments. I was up in North Las Vegas, and driving by housing development after housing development after housing development. Most of them looked new, some under construction and others done within the last year or so. I think the housing bust is starting to take its toll, as an awful lot of houses appeared to be empty.
I talked to a few of the security guards at a construction site opposite my hotel. They told me some facts and war stories. Vegas has more private guards than police, and Vegas has more security guards than any other city in the US. Some of this is due to the casinos, but also there are guards at every construction site in Vegas. This is in contrast to the San Francisco area, where some sites have guards but not all. In Vegas, if you don’t have a guard you are guaranteed to lose something. The thieves will not only steal, but also vandalize.
One of the guards had a friend that was at a site of one of the big casinos. As he was making his rounds, a dump truck came through the fence at about 40 miles an hour, right where his chair was. If he wasn’t walking around, he would have died. On another job, thieves ran a line from the upper floor of the building down to the ground, and slid the copper pipe along it. In another case, they took over $200,000 worth of computer and construction equipment in one night.
I ran across one article on the web that mentions some theft:
VegasTheftOn the plane back, I was reading an interesting article in The Atlantic magazine, not sure if it was August or September issue. It discussed the disappearance of the buffalo from America. The greatest decline occurred in a 10 year period around 1880 or 1890. Although some hunting was due to Americans hunting and to hunting to deprive Indians of food, a Canadian researcher presented a paper recently that indicates a good part of that decline was due to European demand. Europeans had apparently perfected processes to use the hides, and there was a large European demand after the Franco Prussian war. So over a 10 year period, massive numbers of buffaloes were killed for their hides. In contrast to earlier hunting where both the hides and meat were used, the hunting in this period focused on only taking the hides, leaving large amounts of meat rotting on the prairie.
The link to his paper is below, although it’s only a summary link:
Buffalo paper:
BuffaloHis summary of his paper is as follows:
This paper examines the slaughter using theory, empirics, and first person accounts from diaries and other historical documents. It argues that the story of the buffalo slaughter is surprisingly not, at bottom, an American one. Instead I argue that the slaughter on the plains was initiated by a tanning innovation created in Europe, and maintained by a robust European demand for buffalo hides. These market forces overwhelmed the ability of a young and still expanding nation, just out of a bloody civil war, to carefully steward its natural resources.
Specifically, I argue that three conditions are jointly necessary and sufficient to explain the time pattern of buffalo destruction witnessed in the nineteenth century. These are: (1) a price for buffalo products that was largely invariant to changes in supply; (2) open access conditions with no regulation of the buffalo kill; and (3), a newly invented tanning process that made buffalo hides into valuable commercial leather."
I also found a blog that talks about the buffalo and this study:
BuffaloBlog